Commentary
Democratic Security
Bulgaria Votes – Russia Hopes for a New Orbán
16 April 2026
1 March 2024
The War in Ukraine is not lost, but neither is it going well. In this pivotal moment after two years of conflict, it is crucial to reflect upon the significant oversights committed by the analytical, expert and journalistic communities in their coverage of the war. Only in this way can the EU fully comprehend the developing nature of the conflict and effectively plan its defence of Ukraine for years to come.
To err is inherently human, yet the essence of our character lies in our response to errors. Embracing self-critique is hardly enjoyable, but it’s fundamental for learning and denotes intellectual integrity. It also serves as a vital feedback mechanism for us as analysts.
Lacking the capacity or readiness to amend our clear misjudgements condemns us to a cycle of repetition, which runs in contrast against the very essence of analytical thinking – a process that involves meticulous information assessment and source evaluation, among other methods.
This text is a reflective examination and critique of the significant oversights committed by the analytical, expert and journalistic communities in their coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Their/our influence is not insignificant, and thus, accountability is imperative.