Commentary
Democratic Security
Think Tank
Brussels Is Planning the Platform Ukraine Already Built
29 July 2026
30 July 2026
Ten years ago, last month, Britain voted to exit the EU. Keir Starmer became the sixth prime minister to leave Downing Street since then. The legacy of Brexit should concern CEE countries, too.
Clearly, Brexit was not inevitable. It was not the product of inexorable structural forces, nor simply a democratic upsurge of popular Euroscepticism. It was a choice made by a small number of political elites who had the means, the motive, and the moment to act in what turned out to be a historic self-inflicted harm for the United Kingdom.
Prime Minister Cameron called the 2016 referendum not because Britain was structurally destined to leave the EU but because he needed to manage internal Conservative Party schisms, as well as the threat posed by the far-right UK Independence Party (UKIP). Cameron believed he could win yet another referendum, and yet he lost. That single act of political agency set in motion a process that has since cost the British economy between 6 and 8 percent of GDP per capita.
The great misconception about Brexit, shared by both its most fervent champions and its most adamant critics, was the expectation of immediate, dramatic consequences. But the Treasury’s promised economic catastrophe did not materialise overnight. Neither did the promised liberation. What followed instead was what we call a ‘slow poison’ – not a spectacular collapse, but a gradual, compounding erosion of competitiveness, investment attractiveness and regulatory certainty.