Commentary
Politics
Whoever Controls the Narrative of the Slovak National Uprising, Controls Slovakia’s Future – COMMENTARY
5 September 2024
10 December 2020
The Slovak social media landscape is flooded with pro-Kremlin narratives and content, often disseminated and multiplied by domestic actors, including fringe media, influencers and politicians. Recent research tells the story of how a small country of 5 million, which has existed as an independent state less than 30 years, is so open to the Kremlin’s toxic narratives and vulnerable to its sharp power.
Slovakia is and always has been very sensitive to any notion of territorial revisionism due to its history, small size and geographic position. The Trianon Treaty, agreed after the First World War, is seen as a cornerstone of modern-day Slovakia. The fear of territorial revisionism by Slovakia`s southern neighbour – Hungary – and irredentism by Hungarian national minority living in southern Slovakia has been a dominant factor driving the support for nationalist sentiments and political parties since the formation of independent Slovakia.
While the peaceful breakup of Czechoslovakia in 1992 has been widely celebrated as a role model of a democratic political transition, the bloody ethnic wars and ethnic cleansing of the 1990s in the Balkans served as a constant reminder how easy nationalism bound territorial politics could spiral out of control.
Slovakia has never in its recent history expressed any territorial demands nor did it mourn any loss of territory since the formation of Czecho-Slovakia in 1918. Therefore, it comes as a surprise that according to the Pew Research Center survey, 46 per cent of Slovaks consider that part of the neighbouring country should belong to Slovakia.